int delete_module(const char *name);
under 2.6 it is
int delete_module(const char *name, unsigned int flags);
If someone tries to pass an O_NONBLOCK option to a 2.6 kernel, this option gets lost.
Maybe the implementation should be changed to pass the second parameter to the kernel. This will not hurt on 2.4, since the kernel will simply ignore the second parameter and it will help under 2.6. A diff could look as follows:
--- delete_module.c.orig 2008-10-22 10:06:19.493311752 +0200
+++ delete_module.c 2008-10-22 10:07:22.295347373 +0200
@@ -7,11 +7,11 @@
*/
#include <sys/syscall.h>
-int delete_module(const char *name);
+int delete_module(const char *name, unsigned int flags);
#ifdef __NR_delete_module
-_syscall1(int, delete_module, const char *, name);
+_syscall1(int, delete_module, const char *, name, unsigned int, flags);
#elif defined __UCLIBC_HAS_STUBS__
-int delete_module(const char *name)
+int delete_module(const char *name, unsigned int flags)
{
__set_errno(ENOSYS);
return -1;
delete-module-syscall2.patch [^] (730 bytes) 10-22-08 01:20 
