Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 11-10-2008 10:44 PST |
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Docs |
Viewing Issue Simple Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ View Advanced ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
ID | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
0000238 | [BusyBox] Standards Compliance | minor | always | 04-28-05 02:58 | 12-07-05 21:40 | ||||
Reporter | ekl | View Status | public | ||||||
Assigned To | BusyBox | ||||||||
Priority | normal | Resolution | no change required | ||||||
Status | closed | Product Version | 1.00 | ||||||
Summary | 0000238: RPM uses MMAP which may not be portable. | ||||||||
Description |
Its my understanding that busybox was intended for embedded systems such as uClinux. However, I don't believe uClinux, being designed for MMU-less systems, would have an MMU. Therefore, the use of mmap() in rpm.c is probably a bad idea and really kills the possibility of using that code on mmu-less systems. Sorry I don't have a patch to convert it, but the last time I looked at the official rpm sources it didn't use mmap(). |
||||||||
Additional Information | |||||||||
Attached Files | |||||||||
|
Copyright © 2000 - 2006 Mantis Group |