0000164: syscall() missing for m68k - BusyBox Bug and Patch Tracking

BusyBox Bug and Patch Tracking

Viewing Issue Simple Details [ Jump to Notes ]

[ View Advanced ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ]

Category

Severity

Reproducibility

Date Submitted

Last Update

0000164

[uClibc] Architecture Specific

major

always

03-16-05 01:31

01-15-06 01:10

Reporter

d1mag

View Status

public

Assigned To

uClibc

Priority

normal

Resolution

fixed

Status

closed

Product Version

0.9.27

Summary

0000164: syscall() missing for m68k

Description

Added support for syscall() to m68k arch. Have used this with
success for my Coldfire processor, so I don't think there are
any problems with the code.

Additional Information

Attached Files

uc_syscall.txt [^] (2,761 bytes) 03-16-05 01:31

Relationships

Notes
(0000091) vapier 03-16-05 15:07	have you tested a syscall6 with this ? the linux kernel doesnt define syscall6() for m68k, but if you look at glibc, you'll see that they use register %a0 for the 6th arg and not %d6 like you do here ...

(0000938) vapier 01-15-06 01:09	i changed %d6 to %a0 and added to svn if you read linux/include/asm-m68k/entry.h, you'll see that registers %d1-%d5/%a0 are pushed onto the stack in the save_all_sys macro, not %d1-%d6

Issue History
Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
03-16-05 01:31	d1mag	New Issue
03-16-05 01:31	d1mag	File Added: uc_syscall.txt
03-16-05 11:52	andersen	Assigned To	andersen => uClibc
03-16-05 15:07	vapier	Note Added: 0000091
03-16-05 15:07	vapier	Issue Monitored: vapier
01-15-06 01:09	vapier	Note Added: 0000938
01-15-06 01:10	vapier	Status	assigned => closed
01-15-06 01:10	vapier	Resolution	open => fixed