0001550: mount: mounting /dev/sda2 on /mnt/sda2 failed: Device or resource busy - BusyBox Bug and Patch Tracking

BusyBox Bug and Patch Tracking

BusyBox

Viewing Issue Simple Details [ Jump to Notes ]

[ View Advanced ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ]

ID

Category

Severity

Reproducibility

Date Submitted

Last Update

0001550

[BusyBox] New Features

feature

always

10-22-07 21:07

10-25-07 10:48

Reporter

jordon liu

View Status

public

Assigned To

BusyBox

Priority

normal

Resolution

unable to reproduce

Status

closed

Product Version

Summary

0001550: mount: mounting /dev/sda2 on /mnt/sda2 failed: Device or resource busy

Description

hi,
I have port the fuse2.7 and ntfsprogs2.0.0 to the arm platform, base the Montavista linux kernel of 2.6.10 .
it can mkntfs /dev/sda2 successfully,but when I run the command:
ntfsmount /dev/sda2 /mnt/sda2,it complains that:
# ntfsmount /dev/sda2 /mnt/sda2
mount: mounting /dev/sda2 on /mnt/sda2 failed: Device or resource busy
fuse_mount failed.
Unmounting /dev/sda2 ()
#

and I port the ntfs-3g to the arm , run the command still get the result:
# ./ntfs-3g /dev/sda2 /mnt/sda2
mount: mounting /dev/sda2 on /mnt/sda2 failed: Device or resource busy
Unmounting /dev/sda2 ()
#

but I just use the mount /dev/sda2 /mnt/sda2 is succeed.

and my other command use busybox1.2.4, but the mount/umount use the busybox 1.7.4,
since the ntfsmount and ntfs-3g would call mount function, and the "Device or resource busy" was printed by busybox, so maybe the problem was exist at busybox?

Additional Information

Relationships

Notes
(0002860) vda 10-24-07 10:49	> # ntfsmount /dev/sda2 /mnt/sda2 > mount: mounting /dev/sda2 on /mnt/sda2 failed: Device or resource busy > fuse_mount failed. > Unmounting /dev/sda2 () ntfsmount is not a part of busybox. Is it a shell script which calls busybox's mount? > # ./ntfs-3g /dev/sda2 /mnt/sda2 > mount: mounting /dev/sda2 on /mnt/sda2 failed: Device or resource busy > Unmounting /dev/sda2 () Same question - does it use busybox's mount? > since the ntfsmount and ntfs-3g would call mount function, and the "Device or > resource busy" was printed by busybox, so maybe the problem was exist at > busybox? What do you mean by "mount function"? C function? Or do you mean "...would call busybox command"?

(0002861) jordon liu 10-24-07 23:37	sorry, the problem has no relation to busybox. it is my hard disk have problem,and it has no problem after I change a new hard disk. ntfsmount is a project based on busybox and fuse, but it doesn't use c funtion to call busybox mount.c directly. thanks.

Issue History
Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
10-22-07 21:07	jordon liu	New Issue
10-22-07 21:07	jordon liu	Status	new => assigned
10-22-07 21:07	jordon liu	Assigned To	=> BusyBox
10-24-07 10:49	vda	Note Added: 0002860
10-24-07 10:49	vda	Status	assigned => feedback
10-24-07 23:37	jordon liu	Note Added: 0002861
10-25-07 10:48	vda	Status	feedback => closed
10-25-07 10:48	vda	Resolution	open => unable to reproduce

Copyright © 2000 - 2006 Mantis Group