view scripts/test/rm.test @ 1393:3e8ab37a4b60 draft

Find bugfixes. The check for -print vs -print0 was tested before I optimized out the "-" in the strcmps, and I didn't adjust the offset or retest it. (Ooops.) Also, I wasn't clearing the ! value when descending into parentheticals, so "find . -name blah -o \! \( -stuff -o -thing \)" acted like it had a spurious second ! before -stuff inside the parentheses.
author Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
date Fri, 18 Jul 2014 18:31:41 -0500
parents 94677e7b6d97
children
line wrap: on
line source

#!/bin/bash

# Copyright 2013 Robin Mittal <robinmittal.it@gmail.com>
# Copyright 2013 Divya Kothari <divya.s.kothari@gmail.com>

[ -f testing.sh ] && . testing.sh

#testing "name" "command" "result" "infile" "stdin"

echo "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz" > file.txt
testing "Remove text-file" "rm file.txt && [ ! -e file.txt ] && echo 'yes'" "yes\n" "" ""
rm -f file*

mkdir dir
testing "Remove empty directory" "rm -r dir && [ ! -d dir ] && echo 'yes'" "yes\n" "" ""
rm -rf dir

echo "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz" > file.txt && chmod 000 file.txt
testing "Remove text file(mode 000)" "rm -f file.txt && [ ! -e file.txt ] && echo 'yes'" \
  "yes\n" "" ""
rm -f file*

touch file1.txt file2.txt
mkdir dir1 dir2
testing "rm -r (multiple files and dirs)" \
  "rm -r file1.txt file2.txt dir1 dir2 2>/dev/null &&
   [ ! -e file1.txt -a ! -e file2.txt -a ! -d dir1 -a ! -d dir2 ] && echo 'yes'" \
  "yes\n" "" ""
rm -rf file* dir*

touch file1.txt file2.txt
mkdir dir1 dir2
testing "rm -rf (present + missing files and dirs)" \
  "rm -rf file1.txt file2.txt file3.txt dir1 dir2 dir3 2>/dev/null &&
  [ ! -e file1.txt -a ! -e file2.txt -a ! -d dir1 -a ! -d dir2 ] && echo 'yes'" \
  "yes\n" "" ""
rm -rf file* dir*

# testing with nested dirs.
mkdir -p dir1/dir2/dir3 dir1/dir2/dir4
touch dir1/file1.txt dir1/dir2/file2.txt dir1/dir2/dir3/file3.txt
testing "rm -r nested_dir" "rm -r dir1/dir2/ 2>/dev/null &&
  [ -d dir1 -a -f dir1/file1.txt -a ! -d dir1/dir2 ] && echo 'yes'" \
  "yes\n" "" ""
rm -rf dir*