view scripts/test/printf.test @ 1393:3e8ab37a4b60 draft

Find bugfixes. The check for -print vs -print0 was tested before I optimized out the "-" in the strcmps, and I didn't adjust the offset or retest it. (Ooops.) Also, I wasn't clearing the ! value when descending into parentheticals, so "find . -name blah -o \! \( -stuff -o -thing \)" acted like it had a spurious second ! before -stuff inside the parentheses.
author Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
date Fri, 18 Jul 2014 18:31:41 -0500
parents 94677e7b6d97
children
line wrap: on
line source

#!/bin/bash

# Copyright 2013 Robin Mittal <robinmittal.it@gmail.com>
# Copyright 2013 Divya Kothari <divya.s.kothari@gmail.com>

[ -f testing.sh ] && . testing.sh

#testing "name" "command" "result" "infile" "stdin"
#set -x

testing "printf TEXT" "printf toyTestText" "toyTestText" "" ""
testing "printf MULTILINE_TEXT" \
  "printf 'Testing\nmultiline\ntext\nfrom\ntoybox\tcommand.\b'" \
  "Testing\nmultiline\ntext\nfrom\ntoybox\tcommand.\b" "" ""
testing "printf '%5d%4d' 1 21 321 4321 54321" \
  "printf '%5d%4d' 1 21 321 4321 54321" "    1  21  321432154321   0" "" ""
testing "printf '%c %c' 78 79" "printf '%c %c' 78 79" "7 7" "" ""
testing "printf '%d %d' 78 79" "printf '%d %d' 78 79" "78 79" "" ""
testing "printf '%f %f' 78 79" "printf '%f %f' 78 79" \
  "78.000000 79.000000" "" ""
testing "printf 'f f' 78 79" "printf 'f f' 78 79" "f f" "" ""
testing "printf '%i %i' 78 79" "printf '%i %i' 78 79" "78 79" "" ""
testing "printf '%o %o' 78 79" "printf '%o %o' 78 79" "116 117" "" ""
testing "printf '%u %u' 78 79" "printf '%u %u' 78 79" "78 79" "" ""
testing "printf '%u %u' -1 -2" "printf '%u %u' -1 -2" \
  "18446744073709551615 18446744073709551614" "" ""
testing "printf '%x %X' 78 79" "printf '%x %X' 78 79" "4e 4F" "" ""
testing "printf '%g %G' 78 79" "printf '%g %G' 78 79" "78 79" "" ""
testing "printf '%s %s' 78 79" "printf '%s %s' 78 79" "78 79" "" ""