comparison www/design.html @ 117:07d8795fc19c

Link to ars technica paedia broke because ars is now using Windows 2003 on its' webserver and can't competently show "index.html" for a directory. Wheee.
author Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
date Thu, 17 May 2007 02:38:17 -0400
parents ce6956dfc0cf
children 1e8f4b05cb65
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
116:a0678c2ae9b8 117:07d8795fc19c
53 plus this 53 plus this
54 <a href=http://arstechnica.com/articles/paedia/cpu/caching.ars/1>article on 54 <a href=http://arstechnica.com/articles/paedia/cpu/caching.ars/1>article on
55 cacheing</a>, and this one on 55 cacheing</a>, and this one on
56 <a href=http://arstechnica.com/articles/paedia/cpu/bandwidth-latency.ars>bandwidth 56 <a href=http://arstechnica.com/articles/paedia/cpu/bandwidth-latency.ars>bandwidth
57 and latency</a>. 57 and latency</a>.
58 And there's <a href=http://arstechnica.com/paedia/>more where that came from</a>.) 58 And there's <a href=http://arstechnica.com/paedia/index.html>more where that came from</a>.)
59 Running out of L1 cache can execute one instruction per clock cycle, going 59 Running out of L1 cache can execute one instruction per clock cycle, going
60 to L2 cache costs a dozen or so clock cycles, and waiting for a worst case dram 60 to L2 cache costs a dozen or so clock cycles, and waiting for a worst case dram
61 fetch (round trip latency with a bank switch) can cost thousands of 61 fetch (round trip latency with a bank switch) can cost thousands of
62 clock cycles. (Historically, this disparity has gotten worse with time, 62 clock cycles. (Historically, this disparity has gotten worse with time,
63 just like the speed hit for swapping to disk. These days, a _big_ L1 cache 63 just like the speed hit for swapping to disk. These days, a _big_ L1 cache